Carbon dots–cadmium sulfide quantum dots nanocomposite for ‘on–off’ fluorescence sensing of chromium(vi) ions

This work involves fluorescent probe which is composed of carbon dots (CD) and cadmium sulfide quantum dots (CdS QD) for the sensitive and selective fluorescence detection of chromium(vi) ions. The blue fluorescent carbon dots were synthesized by hydrothermal method from natural precursor apricot. The carbon dots–cadmium sulfide quantum dots (CD–CdS QD) nanocomposite was synthesized and all as-synthesized products were characterized using different characterization techniques. It showed white fluorescence under UV light which was quenched selectively in the presence of chromium(vi) ions due to the inner filter effect (IFE). The linear decrease in the white fluorescence was observed in the concentration range 2–120 μM of chromium(vi) ions with the limit of detection 2.07 μM. This is novel probe for the sensitive, selective and rapid detection of chromium(vi) ions.


Introduction
Heavy metal ions are referred to the metal ions with higher density (>5 g cm −3 ).Heavy metal ions can be classied into essential such as Zn 2+ , Fe 2+ , Co 3+ , Cu 2+ , Mn 2+ etc. and nonessential such as Pb 2+ , Hg 2+ , As 3+ and Cr 6+ .Among these, nonessential heavy metal ions are toxic, carcinogenic and hazardous to human health even at low concentrations.Therefore, there are restrictions on the usage of these heavy metal ions in different commodities led by global organizations.Moreover, the presence of these heavy metal ions in the environment, specically in the air, soil and natural water resources are need to be tackled since these are the direct/indirect sources for human/ animal intake. 1 Therefore, it is essential to develop simple, reliable and accurate sensor to detect heavy metal ions.
Chromium is one of the widely used heavy metal ions in different industrial processes pertaining to electroplating, tanning, dying, pigmentation, coating, alloying etc. 2 Out of two stable oxidation states of chromium such as trivalent (Cr(III)) and hexavalent (Cr(VI)), the Cr(III) is essential for human metabolism.Whereas, Cr(VI) is highly toxic, carcinogenic and can cause complicated health issues in human beings by damaging respiratory, intestinal, nervous, reproductive, immunological systems. 3,4The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has recommended the concentration of Cr(VI) to be not more than 100 mg L −1 in drinking water. 5The world health organization has set the limit of Cr(VI) as 0.05 mg L −1 in drinking water. 6Therefore, the detection and tracking of Cr(VI) concentration is important.There are various methodologies already available for detection of chromium and other heavy metal ions in general such as electrochemistry, 7 surface enhanced Raman scattering, 8 colorimetry, 9,10 atomic absorption spectrometry, 11 inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry 12 etc.These methodologies are cumbersome and require costly instruments and proper setup.It is desirable to have simple, rapid and sensitive technique for the detection of heavy metals.The uorescent probe method is one of the methods which can detect heavy metal ions based on simple technique and materials viz.quantum dots, metallic nanocluster and organic dyes etc.
CdS quantum dots are well known due to its size connement, large surface area and narrow band gap.The excellent optical and electronic properties made them to use in various applications such as uorescent sensors, electrochemical sensors and solar cells etc. 13,14 CdS QD is widely used uorescent material for developing uorescent probe for detection of various heavy metal ions such as Cu, 15 Hg 16,17 and Ag. 14 Carbon dots have gained research interest due to their excellent luminescent properties along with low toxicity, small size, biocompatibility, chemical stability, tunable excitation emission spectra and high quantum yield. 18,19Owing to the excellent properties, carbon dots have emerged as an excellent material for uorescent sensing of different heavy metal ions. 20,21Yang et al. discovered the novel test paper method for the detection of Cr(VI). 22hang et al. reported N-doped based carbon dots as uorescent probe for the detection of Cr(VI) and ascorbic acid with lower limit of detection 0.30 mmol L −1 . 23Omer et al. has reported N,P-doped carbon dots for the detection of chromium(II). 24arbon dots are good candidate for many applications due to their good optical and electrical properties and can show excitation dependent photoluminescence behaviour due to different sizes and surface defects or even sometimes the excitation independent behaviour.Similarly, CdS quantum dots also show luminescence in the visible region.The combination of any two uorescent quantum dots is fascinating and can be used as application tool in sensing.In this report, we also got white uorescence by combining these two compounds which is unusual.This type of observed behaviour is presumably due to the overlapping of the energy bands and the energy transfer between them when excited in UV or visible region which is discussed in detail in this manuscript. 25Getting white uorescence was always been interesting due to its applications in various elds such as LEDs, tunable lasers and sensors.Generally inorganic and organic molecules can show white uorescence due to its properties. 26White light can be achieved due to mixing of the two or three complementary colours by tuning the quantities. 27Amalgamation of these two excellent uorescent materials may lead to material with enhanced uorescent properties that can be used as an application tool in sensing.The composite could take advantage of optical properties of both the materials and properties like easy synthesis, low cost, uorescence properties, stability and biocompatibility which make it useful in sensing.
Herein we report a uorescent sensor based on carbon dotscadmium sulde quantum dots (CD-CdS QD) for the effective detection of Cr(VI).CD were synthesized by simple, rapid and green synthesis method.The CdS QD were synthesized by reported hydrothermal method.The nanocomposite CD-CdS QD was prepared which produces white light emission in UV light.The CD, CdS QD and CD-CdS QD nanocomposite were characterized using the different techniques like Ultraviolet visible spectroscopy (UV-Vis), Photoluminescence (PL) spectroscopy, Field emission transmission mlectron microscopy (FETEM), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, zeta potential analysis and lifetime decay measurements.We report a turn off uorescent sensor for selective and sensitive detection of Cr(VI) in the range 2-120 mM.The white uorescence of nanocomposite was decreased linearly in the range 2-10 mM with the detection limit of 2.07 mM.The uorescence quenching in the presence of Cr(VI) occurs due to the inner lter effect as UV-Vis spectra of Cr(VI) overlaps with the excitation/emission spectra of probe and there is no change in the uorescence lifetimes of the sample before and aer the addition of Cr(VI).

Materials
Apricots were purchased from local market.Cadmium(II) chloride anhydrous, mercury(II) chloride, potassium dichromate were purchased from spectrochem ltd.Nickel(II) chloride hexahydrate, copper(II) chloride dihydrate were purchased from Fischer scientic.Iron(III) chloride, barium(II) nitrate, lead(II) acetate trihydrate, magnesium(II) sulphate heptahydrate, Chromium(III) oxide, Cobalt(III) chloride and citric acid were purchased from Qualigens.Iron(II) chloride tetrahydrate was purchased from Thomas baker, zinc(II) chloride and sodium hydroxide pellets from Merck chemicals, manganese sulphate monohydrate from SD ne chemical ltd., arsenic(III) oxide from Alfa aesar.Thioacetamide was procured from lobachem ltd.Sodium phosphate dibasic heptahydrate and sodium phosphate monobasic monohydrate were purchased from Loba chemicals.Deionized water was used throughout the experiments.

Synthesis of CD
CD were prepared by single step hydrothermal method using apricot as carbon source.The detailed procedure is as follows.2.66 g of apricot was grated and dispersed in 50 mL of DI water and soaked for 2 h.This solution was then ltered through Whatman lter paper grade 1.Out of this ltrate; 25 mL was collected and mixed with 25 mL of ethanol.This solution was transferred to 100 mL Teon lined stainless steel autoclave and heated at 150 °C for 3 h.The obtained brown colored solution of CD was naturally cooled and again ltered through Whatman lter paper grade 1 to remove any residual impurities present.The CD were collected as a ltrate and stored for further analysis and making composite.The resulting CD brown solution showed blue uorescence under UV light. 28

Synthesis of CdS QD
The CdS QD were prepared by hydrothermal method earlier reported elsewhere. 15Firstly, 0.25 mmol CdCl 2 and 0.5 mmol citric acid were dissolved in 50 mL DI water.Aer 15 min of stirring, the pH value was adjusted to 10 using 1 M NaOH and then 0.0625 mmol thioacetamide was added to the solution under continuous stirring.The reaction mixture was stirred for 30 min and then transferred to 200 mL Teon lined stainless steel autoclave.The autoclave was heated at 120 °C for 2 h.The obtained yellow colored solution was used as it is for further analysis and making composite.The obtained solution showed orange uorescence under UV light.

Preparation of CD-CdS QD nanocomposite
The CD-CdS QD nanocomposite was prepared by mixing appropriate quantities (experimentally optimized) of CD and CdS QD to get white uorescence.For this purpose, 100 mL of CD solution was taken into the beaker and to this solution 4 mL of CdS QD solution was added.This mixture was stirred for about 10-15 min.The resultant yellowish colored composite solution exhibited white uorescence under UV light.

Characterization
The as prepared CD, CdS QD and CD-CdS QD nanocomposite had been characterized using different characterization techniques.Optical absorption properties were studied using UVvisible spectrometer (Jasco V-570).Optical emission studies and sensing experiments were carried out using Fluorolog Horiba jobinyvon at different excitation wavelengths.The FTIR analysis was done using the instrument IRAffinity-1S by Shimadzu.The liquid sample was coated on the glass substrate for this analysis.The morphology was observed using eld emission transmission electron microscope (FETEM) Model: JEOL 2200FS operated at 200 keV electron energy.The samples were dispersed in ethanol and later coated on copper grid for the analysis.The X-ray photoelectron spectroscopic study was carried out by using model XPS, ESCA-3000, VG Scientic Ltd at pressure1 × 10 −9 torr.The uorescence decay analysis was done using the Fluorescence Endinburg instrument FS5.Zeta potential measurement was carried out by using Horiba PSA DLS SZ-100-Z2.

Quantum yield (QY) measurement
The QY of the as-synthesized CD, CdS QD and CD-CdS QD nanocomposite were measured by diluting the sample in DI water.The UV-Vis and uorescence spectra were recorded using 10 mm quartz cuvette.Quinine sulphate in 0.1 M [H 2 SO 4 ] was used as a standard reference for CD, CD-CdS QD and 0.1 M rhodamine 6G for CdS QD.The QY of quinine sulphate is 0.54 and rhodamine 6G is 0.95.The following equation was used to evaluate the QY.
where QY ref is the QY of the reference material (0.54 for quinine sulphate and 0.95 for the rhodamine 6G), h is the refractive index of the solvent, h ref is the refractive index of reference, A is the absorption at the given wavelength, and I is the integrated uorescence emission intensity.The uorescence QY of CD at l ex = 375 nm and CD-CdS QD at l ex = 350 nm were calculated to be 3.18%, and 1.04% respectively and the integrated luminescence intensity of CD and CD-CdS QD was compared to that of standard quinine sulfate.The uorescence QY of CdS QD at l ex = 375 nm was calculated to be 5.08% with rhodamine 6G as a reference.

Metal ion sensing
The various uorescent based materials are explored nowadays and used for heavy metal ion sensing according to the literature survey.The selectivity of uorescent CD-CdS QD nanocomposite was checked with 15 different metal ions like Cu 2+ , Ni 2+ , Zn 2+ , Mn 2+ , Mg 2+ , Fe 2+ , Fe 3+ , Ba 2+ , Hg 2+ , Pb 2+ , Cd 2+ , Cr 6+ , Cr 3+ , Co 3+ and As 3+ .For this purpose, 1 mM stock solutions of all these interfering metal ions were prepared by using respective salts in DI water.To check the selectivity, 200 mL of composite sample was mixed with 2 mL of phosphate buffer (pH 5.8) and 2 mL of 50 mM solution of different metal ions solutions.The nanocomposite showed good selectivity towards the Cr 6+ ions with uorescence quenching.The uorescence measurements were taken and spectra were recorded at excitation wavelength of 350 nm.

Results and discussion
3.1 Characterization of CD, CdS QD and CD-CdS QD The optical absorption of as-synthesized products have been characterized using UV-Vis spectrometer.Fig. 1a displays optical absorption spectrum of CD.It shows absorption peaks at 227 nm and 282 nm which can be corresponded to p / p* transition of C]C and n / p* transitions of C]O respectively. 29The results are in accordance with the literature.The CD solution when observed under UV light show strong blue uorescence (inset Fig. 1a).
The UV-visible spectra of CdS QD (Fig. 1c) shows peak at 424 nm.The peak at 424 nm conrms the presence of CdS quantum dots.The blue shi is observed than the CdS bulk material which shows peak at 522 nm. 30The CdS QD show orange uorescence under UV light (inset Fig. 1c).
The UV-visible spectra of CD-CdS QD (Fig. 1e) nanocomposite shows peaks at 220 nm and 278 nm which conrms the presence of CD and peak at 422 nm conrms the presence of CdS QD in the nanocomposite.In case of nanocomposite, the CD absorption peaks observed at 220 nm and 278 nm are slightly blue shied than the bare CD which conrms the formation of nanocomposite.The nanocomposite shows white uorescence under UV light (inset Fig. 1e).
The Fig. 1b shows the photoluminescence spectra of CD which shows the excitation dependent photoluminescence behavior. 29The sample was excited at different excitation wavelengths from 300 nm to 475 nm with the increment of 25 nm.The red shi is observed with the increase in the excitation wavelength.The highest PL intensity is observed at 447 nm when excited at 375 nm.
The PL spectra of CdS QD (Fig. 1d) shows peak at 633 nm.The CdS QD PL spectra shows excitation independent behaviour. 15The sample was excited from 375 nm to 475 nm, however there is no shi.The highest intensity is recorded when excited at 375 nm.
The PL spectrum of CD-CdS QD nanocomposite (Fig. 1f) shows excitation dependent photoluminescence behaviour.The nanocomposite was excited at different wavelengths from 300 nm to 475 nm and the red shi is observed.The highest intensity is observed at 422 nm when excited at 350 nm.
The morphology and the size of as-synthesized products have been investigated using eld emission transmission electron microscopy (FETEM) analysis.The FETEM photomicrographs of CD (Fig. 2a) show uniformly dispersed CD with spherical morphology.The average particle size observed is about 1-3 nm in diameter.The particle size distribution is shown as inset Fig. 2a.The FETEM image of CdS QD (Fig. 2b) also shows the uniformly distributed spherical particles of CdS with average particle size between 2-4 nm diameters (inset Fig. 2b).In case of CD-CdS QD nanocomposite (Fig. 2c), the clusters are observed which are formed due to simultaneous collective agglomeration of CD and CdS QD.The clusters are spherical in shape with average size around 200-500 nm.The focused single cluster (Fig. 2d) clearly shows the so spherical agglomeration of CD and CdS QD with size 4-7 nm in diameter (inset Fig. 2d).The presence of CD and CdS QD in these clusters was further conrmed by HAADF-STEM and corresponding EDX elemental mapping of these nanoclusters is presented in Fig. 3.The high-angle annular dark eld scanning TEM (HAADF STEM) mode of selected cluster shows the formation of spherical cluster of size around 500 nm which is covering the full image.The cluster is observed to be made up of so agglomerated nanoparticles of CD and CdS QD with size less than 10 nm.The elemental mapping images also show presence of C, Cd and S in the selected sphere.
The Fig. 4 depicts the FTIR spectra of CD, CdS QD and CD-CdS QD nanocomposite.The broad band observed at around 3250-3310 cm −1 in all the products can be assigned to O-H stretching vibrations.This O-H stretching vibration band has been observed to be shied to lower wavenumbers in case of nanocomposite than individual CD and CdS QD.This implies that O-H might have contributed for composite formation by providing the binding site.The C-H stretching vibration is observed only in case of CD c.a. 2932 cm −1 .The bands at 1635 cm −1 and 1410 cm −1 are observed in CD because of C]O and COO − groups present at the surface of CD. 31 The bands c.a. 1558 cm −1 and 1388 cm −1 are observed in CdS QD can be assigned to asymmetrical and symmetrical stretching of carboxylate functions of citrate. 32These bands are also present in case of nanocomposite with slightly reduced intensities.The C-O stretching band is observed in all the products at around 1050 cm −1 .The peak at 625 cm −1 in pristine CdS QD shied to  The change in the wavenumbers suggests that, there can be interaction between the functional groups of CD and CdS QD. 33 The X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) analysis was performed to study the surface chemical composition of the assynthesized CD, CdS and CD-CdS QD.The Fig. 5a presents the survey scan of all as-synthesized products which show peaks  35 The XPS scan for pristine CdS QD (Fig. 5c) indicates Cd 3d XPS spectra with peaks at 404.4 eV and 411.2 eV which are attributed to Cd 3d 5/2 and Cd 3d 3/2 which conrms the presence of Cd 2+ in the pristine CdS QD.The XPS spectra of S 2p of bare CdS QD (Fig. 5c) indicates peaks at 160.8 eV, 162 eV and 168 eV due to S 2p 3/2 , S 2p 1/2 and oxidized form of S respectively. 15n case of nanocomposite, the Cd 3d XPS spectra (Fig. 5d) have peaks at 404.7 eV and 411.4 eV which are due to Cd 3d 5/2 and Cd 3d 3/2 respectively and the S 2p XPS spectra of CD-CdS QD (Fig. 6d) shows peaks at 161 eV and 162.2 eV which are attributed to S 2p 3/2 and S 2p 1/2 respectively.The peak at 168.2 eV is assigned to oxidized form of S i.e.SO 3 2− and SO 4 2− on the external surface.The presence of Cd 3d and S 2p in the XPS of nanocomposite conrms the presence of the CdS in the nanocomposite.As the positive shi can be seen in the binding energies of Cd 3d and S 2p in the composite than the pristine CdS QD.The positive shi and change in the intensity suggest a decrease in the electron density of CdS which may be due to the interaction between CdS QD and CD.There can be electron transfer from CdS QD to CD. 36,37 In the C 1s XPS spectra (Fig. 5d) of the nanocomposite, the peaks at 284.6 eV, 286.1 eV and 288 eV are due to the C-C, C-OH and O-C]O bands respectively which conrms the presence of CD in the nanocomposite. 38The O 1s spectra of CD-CdS QD (Fig. 5d) have peaks at 530.9, 532.4 and 535.3 which are attributed to C-OH, O-C]O bands and auguer peak of Na respectively. 15,39The XPS results are well in agreement with the FTIR data.The Fig. 6a and b shows the zeta potential measurements of CD and CdS QD.The zeta potential values of CD and CdS QD are 3.59 mV and −6.82 mV respectively.It is concluded that CD and CdS QD can be associated due to electrostatic attraction between their surface functional groups as both are oppositely charged molecules.
The interaction between the CD and CdS QD is conrmed from the zeta potential, FTIR and TEM studies.The electrostatic interaction is conrmed between them from the zeta potential measurements.The TEM images shows the increased size of nanocomposite which is due to the so agglomeration of both the samples which is also conrmed from the HAADF STEM and EDX mapping.The presence of all the pertinent elements is conrmed from the mapping as well as XPS spectra.The particle size distribution also shows the increased size in case of composite than the bare CD and CdS QD.

Fluorescence stability
The uorescence stability was checked with the effect of pH, ionic strength and the stability time.The Fig. 7a shows the effect of pH on the uorescence of nanocomposite.It is observed that the intensity is higher in the range of pH 4-7.The uorescence is lower in more acidic and alkaline medium.The highest uorescence intensity is observed at pH 5.8.Fig. 7b shows the changes in the uorescence intensity on changing the NaCl concentration in the range 0.1 mM-1 M.There is no signicant change in the intensity, on changing the ionic strength, indicating the feasibility of probe in high salt concentration.Fig. 7c shows the uorescence intensity of the composite over the period of 6 days.It is observed that the uorescence is stable for long period.

Detection of Cr 6+
The selectivity of CD-CdS QD uorescent probe was checked with 50 mM solutions of 15 different metal ions viz.Cu 2+ , Ni 2+ , Zn 2+ , Mn 2+ , Mg 2+ , Fe 2+ , Fe 3+ , Ba 2+ , Hg 2+ , Pb 2+ , Cd 2+ , Cr 6+ , Cr 3+ , Co 3+ and As 3+ .The Fig. 8a presents the photoluminescence spectra which show uorescence intensity of probe in the presence of different metal ions.It was observed that the white uorescence was quenched in the presence of Cr 6+ ions and the uorescence change was negligible in the presence of 50 mM solutions of other metal ions which showed the strong The sensitivity study of probe for Cr 6+ ions was done with different concentrations in the range 2-120 mM and the emission spectra were recorded.The uorescence intensity was decreased linearly with the increasing concentrations of Cr 6+ ions in the range 2-10 mM (Fig. 8c).The relative uorescence response of CD-CdS QD (F 0 /F) versus concentration of Cr 6+ is shown in the Fig. 8d where F 0 represents the uorescence intensity in absence of Cr 6+ and F represents the uorescence intensity in presence of Cr 6+ .A steady decline in uorescence intensity of probe with increasing concentration of Cr 6+ was observed.The response time of probe to react with heavy metal ions was less than 1 minute which is quite low and better for detection of heavy metals.The correlation coefficient 0.965 proves the linear relationship.The limit of detection was 2.07 mM based on 3s/slope method.
Table 1 shows the comparison of the CD-CdS QD probe with the already reported literature for Cr 6+ detection using different precursors.The limit of detection is comparable with the earlier reported work and it is lower than detection limits set by WHO and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.As compared to other reports, the sensing method used is simple, rapid and sensitive.The starting material used for CD synthesis is green.The synthesis of nanocomposite is easy, rapid and this nanocomposite material is rarely used before for this application.The uorescence of as-synthesized products is stable for long time.The response time of the probe is less than 1 minute which is one of the advantages for heavy metal detection.The composite is showing white uorescence which can only get by adding the complementary uorescent colors which is quite interesting and useful in the LEDs, lasers, lamps.So, the material can be used for WLEDs in future.This suggests that the CD-CdS QD can be efficient towards Cr(VI) detection.

Quenching mechanism
The uorescence quenching by the heavy metal ion involves many possible mechanisms like inner lter effect (IFE), static quenching, dynamic quenching and forster resonance energy transfer (FRET) etc. 1 Here, the uorescence intensity of the nanocomposite was quenched in the presence of Cr(VI) ions.The possible mechanism was checked.The IFE required the good spectral overlap between the absorption band of the absorber and the excitation and/or emission band of the uorophore. 47,48As shown in the Fig. 8a, the Cr(VI) ions exhibit three absorption bands at 256 nm, 361 nm and 440 nm.The CD-CdS QD nanocomposite shows excitation band at 366 nm and emission band at 449 nm.As observed from the Fig. 9A, there is good spectral overlap between the absorption of absorber (red line) and the excitation (black line) and emission band (blue line) of the uorophore.Cr(VI) ions can absorb the excitation as well as the emission light of the CD-CdS nanocomposite.It was believed that, IFE is responsible for the uorescence quenching. 2,6,49The lifetime of the composite was measured in absence (black) and presence (blue) of Cr(VI) ions as shown in Fig. 9B.There was no signicant change in the lifetime which can conrm the quenching was due to the IFE.
The possibility of FRET and dynamic quenching mechanism was ruled out as there was no change in the lifetime.There was no change in the absorption of the composite in the presence and absence of the Cr(VI) ion which excluded the possibility of the static quenching mode which indicates that there is no complex formation in the composite with the heavy metal. 1 Therefore, the possible mechanism was IFE for the quenching.

Conclusions
The carbon dots (CD) and cadmium sulde quantum dots (CdS QD) were successfully synthesized via hydrothermal method.
The white uorescent CD-CdS QD nanocomposite was prepared by simple mixing of the individual entities in appropriate quantities.The CD and CdS QD are associated due to the electrostatic attraction.The sensing response of the nanocomposite was checked with different heavy metal ions solution which showed good selectivity towards the Cr 6+ ions.The white uorescence was decreased linearly with increasing concentration of Cr 6+ from 2-10 mM in the range of 2-120 mM.The limit of detection and the correlation coefficient was 2.07 mM and 0.965 respectively.The quenching of the uorescence was probably due to the inner lter effect (IFE) which was conrmed from the overlap of absorbance of uorophore and excitation/emission of the probe.The developed sensing method is simple, sensitive, selective and rapid for the detection of Cr 6+ ions.

Fig. 1
Fig. 1 UV-visible spectra of (a) CD (c) CdS QD (e) CD-CdS QD (inset: solution under day light (left) and UV light (right)) and photoluminescence spectra of (b) CD (d) CdS QD (f) CD-CdS QD.

Fig. 2
Fig. 2 FETEM images of (a) CD, inset: particle size distribution of CD (b) CdS QD, inset: particle size distribution of CdS QD (c) CD-CdS QD nanoclusters (d) CD-CdS QD nanocomposite focused image, inset: particle size distribution of CD-CdS QD.

Fig. 4
Fig.4FTIR spectra of CD, CdS QD and CD-CdS QD.

Fig. 3
Fig. 3 Representative HAADF-STEM and the corresponding EDX mapping of elements C (violet), Cd (red), S (green) and the overlay of CD-CdS QD nanocomposite.

Fig. 5
Fig. 5 (a) XPS survey scan of CD, CdS QD and CD/CdS QD (b) XPS scans of CD (c) XPS scans of CdS QD (d) XPS scans of CD/CdS QD.

Fig. 8
Fig. 8 Selectivity of the probe in presence of different metal ions (a) fluorescence study (b) bar diagram of F/F 0 vs. metal ions (c) fluorescence study of probe in presence of different concentrations of Cr 6+ ions (d) relative fluorescence response of CD-CdS QD (F 0 /F) versus concentration of Cr 6+ .

Fig. 9 (
Fig. 9 (A) (a) Absorbance of chromium (red line) (b) excitation of nanocomposite (black line) (c) emission of the nanocomposite (blue line) (B) lifetime decay curve of composite in absence of chromium(VI) ions (red) and presence of chromium(VI) ions (blue).

Table 1
Comparison of the present study with the previously reported reports